Tuesday, November 5, 2013

Obama Now Lying to Cover His Lies

At AoSHQ, "Obama's Covering Up His Gigantic Lie With, Get This, a New Gigantic Lie":


The new lie is added to this supercut of the 36 times (and counting) Obama said "If you like your plan, you can keep your plan. Period."

Note that he could repeat his lie without the aid of notes -- but now when he offers his new lie -- claiming that "What we said was that... you could keep your plain if your plan didn't change [at all]" -- he needs some Lawyer's Notes to guide him.

On Megyn Kelly last night, Judge Napolitano pointed out the power of adding Period to the end of most of these vows. When one says "Period," one means there is no fine print. There are no caveats, conditions, or qualifications. "Period" means that the vow you just heard is self-contained; there is no extraenous material elsewhere you have to check to determine what the promise means.

But that's exactly what he's saying "Period" doesn't mean now. Now he's claiming "Period" meant-- actually, he's claiming "we" said this, which is a lie -- "unless there have been any changes [whatsoever] to your policy."

Such as $5 increase in your copay to keep pace with rising medical costs. Yes, a $5 change in your copay ungrandfathers your policy. The HHS deliberately wrote these rules to terminate as many policies as possible.

Actually, the lie is deeper than that. Because if you thought "If you like your plan, you could keep your plan" meant that you would be held harmless by the changes wrought by Obamacare, then you were misled -- even grandfathered policies, for example, must have their premiums jacked up in order to pay for the sick and uninsurable.

Another part of Obamacare says that insurers can't discriminate based on health status, which means the sick pay less... and the healthy, necessarily, pay more. A lot more.

And the guarantee of "If you like your policy, you can keep your policy" was never intended to mean you wouldn't be shellacked by higher rates. Or, at least, it was intended to be understood as meaning that; Obama always knew that wasn't the way he was setting it up to work.

In other words: You were never going to keep your old policy. Even as regards grandfathered policies, you were always going to have something new: Steeply increased premiums, which represent a hidden tax to redistribute wealth to Obama's constituents.

So the only people allowed to change your policy were... Obama's HHS officials, by jacking up your premiums.

He flat out lied. And lied and lied and lied. And now he's lying some more.
More at that top link.

VIDEO CREDIT: Free Beacon, "36 Times Obama Said You Can Keep Your Health Plan."

Running Scared: Mary Landrieu Introduces 'Keeping the Affordable Care Act Promise Act'

Bwahaha!

They're eating their own.

And you know, I guess even Democrats don't buy the stupid regressive spin that it's all the insurance companies' fault. You know, that they just dumped consumers off their plans, totally unrelated to ObamaCare, or something.

Landrieu's smart enough to know that voters aren't that stupid.

At the Weekly Standard, "Landrieu Introduces Bill to 'Keep Promise' of Obamacare":


Senator Mary Landrieu, the Democrat from Louisiana, has introduced a bill called the "Keeping the Affordable Care Act Promise Act." The bill recognizes that Americans are losing their individual health plans because they don't conform to the new regulations under the Affordable Care Act, better known as Obamacare. During the debate over health care reform in 2009 and 2010, Democrats who supported the law like Barack Obama and Landrieu herself promised that if Americans liked their health care plans they could keep it under Obamacare.

"When we passed the Affordable Care Act, we did so with the intention that if you liked your health plan, you could keep it. A promise was made and this legislation will ensure that this promise is kept. For many consumers, plans in the Marketplaces may offer superior coverage at a good value that saves them money. But people should be able to keep their plans if they want to," Landrieu said in a statement. "I have said repeatedly that the Affordable Care Act isn't perfect, and I am willing to work with anyone who wants to improve it and implement it correctly. Middle class families and businesses need and deserve access to quality, affordable health insurance, and I hope that leaders from around the country and from both parties will join me in this effort."

Landrieu, who is up for reelection in 2014, isn't exactly running away from the law she voted to pass in 2010. But her acknowledgement of the law's problematic implementation is significant.

#ExemptMeToo

From Americans for Prosperity, a fantastic ad:



Dependency Nation — Millions of Americans to Score Free Healthcare Under #ObamaCare

From yesterday's New York Times, "Under Health Care Act, Millions Eligible for Free Policies":
The analysis [by McKinsey and Co.] found that five million to six million people who are uninsured will qualify for subsidies that will be greater than the cost of the cheapest bronze or silver plan. A million more people with individual insurance could also be eligible, according to McKinsey, although estimates of the size of the market for private individual insurance vary widely. None of the people in the analysis qualify for Medicaid.

The availability of zero-premium plans may make the deal especially enticing to the healthy young people the marketplace needs to succeed, said Mark V. Pauly, a professor of health care management at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School. “This is such a good deal that you’d have to believe you were immortal not to really pick it up,” he said.
Yeah, so taxpayers will be picking up the health insurance tabs of people like the "Elisabeth and Mark Horst, artists in Albuquerque who earn $24,000 a year between them, qualified for a zero-premium plan." These are Ph.D. holding "artistes" living the sweet life in the American Southwest.

William Jacobson has that, "Congrats America, you are subsidizing health insurance for Ivy League Ph.D’s who choose to paint":

Free ObamaCare photo NYT-Artists-free-Obamacare-1_zpscb51d516.jpg
I have nothing against the Horsts. Living and painting in Albuquerque is a dream for many people.

But why should the taxpayers have to subsidize what clearly is a lifestyle choice? The Horsts are not exactly uneducated or without choices in their lives.

Here’s a part of Mark Horst’s bio at his art website:
Mark Horst grew up in small town Minnesota. He studied pottery and printmaking in high school and college, but his encounter with Dorothy Day and the Catholic Worker led to years of very different work. After earning a Ph.D. in theology from Yale University, he spent time teaching and working toward neighborhood renewal in south Minneapolis. He pursued the craft of painting and drawing at the Minneapolis College of Art and Design and the New York Studio School. He lives in Albuquerque.

If paint were a means of freezing time and protecting us from the dangerous life of the spirit, I would put down my brushes. But, for me, painting is a way of breaking time’s grip and setting loose something wild and strong.
Elizabeth also is highly educated and closed her psychology practice to paint:
I studied philosophy at Yale, psychology at the University of Minnesota, and in addition have trained in Reiki, yoga instruction, and shiatsu. As for art… I taught myself to knit at the age of seven, designed and made my own clothes in high school, stitched a quilt while writing my senior essay in college. Fiber art has always been what I do when I am not required to be doing something else (and sometimes when I am). I began to sell my handwoven scarves at art fairs and farmers markets in 2002, and in 2003 closed my psychology practice to make art full time.
More power to the Horsts. But don’t ask me to subsidize their lifestyle choice.
And don't forget, these provisions of the law are a huge incentive for people not to work. That way, they'll lower their annual income and qualify for subsidies.

From the San Francisco Chronicle last month, "Lower 2014 income can net huge health care subsidy."

Behold "dependency nation" expanding exponentially before your very eyes --- just what Democrats have planned all along, to create a nation of welfare queen zombies sucking the vitality from the American economy.

Yep, congratulations Americans, you're digging your own graves.

Loop of Death

Seriously. A death loop.

Damn, what a video.

A couple of these dudes were skating back in the day, Steve Caballero, Mike McGill, Tony Magnusson.

And I don't know the mofo who took a hospital-worthy slam. He hits as hard as anyone I've ever seen. Broke his shoulder for sure. Maybe his collarbone as well.



'So if you're tired of the same old story...'

From yesterday's drive-time, at The Sound L.A.

I hadn't heard REO in quite some time, especially "Roll With the Changes."

Roll With the Changes - REO Speedwagon 10:05 AM

Changes - David Bowie 10:01 AM

Strange Magic - Electric Light Orchestra 09:56 AM

White Rabbit - Jefferson Airplane 09:47 AM

Train In Vain - The Clash 09:44 AM

Jet - Paul McCartney & Wings 09:40 AM

Hells Bells - AC/DC 09:35 AM

Stumbling, Bumbling Lame-Duck Obama Seeks to Shift Momentum

And what better way for the lame-duck loser to shift the debate from ObamaCare momentum than talking about immigration reform? Doh!

At WSJ, "Obama Shifts Focus in Bid for Momentum: Organizes Flurry of Events on the Economy and Immigration":
Problems with the government's health-care website are forcing President Barack Obama to redraw his plans for the rest of the year as he looks for ways to regain political momentum.

Scrapping a planned push to drive people to the balky website, the White House is organizing a flurry of events on the economy and immigration, as well as health care, a senior administration official said.

Several executive actions are in the works related to workplace skills and other matters, this person said, as the president moves to sidestep a polarized Congress to advance his agenda.

The president will headline a health-care event Monday with Obama re-election campaign supporters and another on Wednesday in Texas with volunteers who are helping consumers learn about and enroll" in the health-care program, according to the White House. On Tuesday, he will hold an event on immigration, followed by an economic event Friday at a port in New Orleans. The schedule will make Mr. Obama more visible than in recent weeks, which he has spent largely behind the scenes.

The White House is also preparing to announce several executive actions in December, including private-sector partnerships, aimed at jobs and economic growth, a senior administration official said. The actions, which are still being crafted, will focus on infrastructure and increasing workforce skills—a priority of business leaders Mr. Obama has been meeting with in recent weeks, the official said.

A push to raise the minimum wage is also under discussion in the West Wing, people familiar with the issue said. Mr. Obama urged Congress during his State of the Union address early this year to increase the federal minimum wage to $9 an hour, from $7.25 now, and index it to inflation. The proposal didn't gain momentum.

Now, Mr. Obama plans to spend more time on a minimum-wage increase, the senior administration official said, although White House officials said they don't expect Congress to act on it by the end of the year.
No, they won't act on it --- but boy, that oughta work wonders to change the subject from the healthcare debacle. That, and homosexual rights!

At Twitchy, "Here we go: President readying for another pivot — far away from Obamacare."

Rainbows and unicorns --- and S&M bullwhips!

Bwahahaha!



Four Legal Arguments Why #ObamaCare is Bad Law and Ought to Be Overturned

From Kelly O'Connell, at Canada Free Press.

Pew Research Center: Twitter News Consumers — Young, Mobile and Educated

An interesting survey, from the Pew Research Journalism Project:
Nearly one-in-ten U.S. adults (8%) get news through Twitter, according to a new report by the Pew Research Center, in collaboration with the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. Compared with the 30% of Americans who get news on Facebook, Twitter news consumers stand out as younger, more mobile and more educated.

In addition, a separate Pew Research analysis of conversations on Twitter around major news events reveals three common characteristics: much of what gets posted centers on passing along breaking news; sentiments shift considerably over time; and however passionate, the conversations do not necessarily track with public opinion.

This two-part report is based first on a survey of more than 5,000 U.S. adults (including 736 Twitter users and 3,268 Facebook users) and, second, on an analysis of Twitter conversations surrounding major news events which spanned nearly three years. Twitter posts were analyzed for the information shared, sentiments expressed and ebb and flow of interest.

According to the survey, 16% of U.S. adults use Twitter. Among those, roughly half (52%) “ever” get news there — with news defined as “information about events and issues that involve more than just your friends or family.”

Mobile devices are a key point of access for these Twitter news consumers. The vast majority, 85%, get news (of any kind) at least sometimes on mobile devices. That outpaces Facebook news consumers by 20 percentage points; 64% of Facebook news consumers use mobile devices for news. The same is true of 40% of all U.S. adults overall, according to the survey.

Twitter news consumers stand out for being younger and more educated than both the population overall and Facebook news consumers.
RTWT.

Beautiful Kate Hudson on the Cover of Shape

I saw the magazine at CVS yesterday while picking up my meds.

She's fabulous.

At London's Daily Mail, "It's no wonder she has abs of steel! Mother-of-two Kate Hudson displays her rock hard stomach on the cover of Shape magazine after doing Pilates for 15 YEARS."

And at Shape, "Kate Hudson on How She Stays Fit and Beautiful."

Kate Hudson photo photo-36_zps1c6e97f0.jpg

Monday, November 4, 2013

Obama’s Catastrophic Victory

From Peggy Noonan, at the Wall Street Journal:
They said if you liked your insurance you could keep your insurance—but that’s not true. It was never true! They said if you liked your doctor you could keep your doctor—but that’s not true. It was never true! They said they would cover everyone who needed it, and instead people who had coverage are losing it—millions of them! They said they would make insurance less expensive—but it’s more expensive! Premium shock, deductible shock. They said don’t worry, your health information will be secure, but instead the whole setup looks like a hacker’s holiday. Bad guys are apparently already going for your private information.

Look at the simple, factual eloquence of Edie Littlefield Sundby, from Monday’s Journal. It is a story that tells you everything you need to know about ObamaCare. It is the single most persuasive and informative piece written since the whole program began.

And now there are reports the insurance companies are taking advantage of the chaos of the program, and its many dislocations, to hike premiums. Meaning the law was written in such a way that insurance companies profit on it.

And—I am limiting things to just today’s news – the New York Times reports that while millions may qualify for enough federal subsidies to pay the entire monthly cost of some health-insurance plans, the zero premiums come with some “serious trade-offs.” What serious trade-offs? Most of these plans, called the bronze policies, “require people to pay the most in out-of-pocket costs, for doctor visit and other benefits like hospital stays.” Huh? I thought the purpose of the law was to help with the cost of doctor visits and hospital stays!
Yesterday Fox News was on ObamaCare all night. This catastrophe ain't dyin' down any time soon.

More at that top link.

Information Surge! — #MyHealthPlanDied

At Michelle Malkin's, "#MyHealthPlanDied – A national social media information surge":

Health Plan Died photo BYPmypICEAAIMJ5_zpsd9ad9efa.png
Over the weekend, I asked AFP activists in Illinois to join me in a national day of mourning and protest today along with millions of other Americans whose insurance plans have been canceled thanks to Obamacare’s top-down tyranny. The do-gooders continue to lie, mock, and smear those who are being forced onto the exchanges and who face massive sticker shock despite Pinocchiobama’s promise that they could keep their plans if they liked them and keep their doctors if they liked them.

Here’s what you can do to raise your voices:
1) Tweet a phot of your cancellation to @WhiteHouse and @MyCancellation 
2) Use #MyHealthPlanDied hashtag for all related tweets; and
3) Contact local media with your story.
My story: Obama lied, my health plan died.

In the WSJ today:
Everyone now is clamoring about Affordable Care Act winners and losers. I am one of the losers. My grievance is not political; all my energies are directed to enjoying life and staying alive, and I have no time for politics. For almost seven years I have fought and survived stage-4 gallbladder cancer, with a five-year survival rate of less than 2% after diagnosis. I am a determined fighter and extremely lucky. But this luck may have just run out: My affordable, lifesaving medical insurance policy has been canceled effective Dec. 31.

My choice is to get coverage through the government health exchange and lose access to my cancer doctors, or pay much more for insurance outside the exchange (the quotes average 40% to 50% more) for the privilege of starting over with an unfamiliar insurance company and impaired benefits. Countless hours searching for non-exchange plans have uncovered nothing that compares well with my existing coverage. But the greatest source of frustration is Covered California, the state’s Affordable Care Act health-insurance exchange and, by some reports, one of the best such exchanges in the country. After four weeks of researching plans on the website, talking directly to government exchange counselors, insurance companies and medical providers, my insurance broker and I are as confused as ever. Time is running out and we still don’t have a clue how to best proceed.
After years of phony Obamacare fables, which the MSM swallowed whole, it’s time the media started reported the true horror stories of progressive wreckage.

The information surge is just beginning.
That's Hadley Heath at the photo. Here's her story, at the Washington Examiner, "For some, losing so-called bad apple health insurance plans will mean paying more for less."

Jay Carney Paper Process Enrollment Meltdown – #MyHealthPlanDied

Jonathan Karl reported today that paper and phone ObamaCare enrollment takes just as long as logging on to Healthcare.gov. "We're all stuck in the same queue." See, "Obamacare Paper, Phone, Web Apps ‘Stuck in the Same Queue,’ Memos Note."



Here's the exchange, "Carney gets animated as reporter pressures him on Obamacare (Video)."

And also from Mandy Nagy, at Legal Insurrection, "Jay Carney nears meltdown over questions about Obamacare application process."

Leftists Smear Stage-4 Cancer Survivor Whose Insurance Plan Was Curb-Stomped Under #ObamaCare

It was inevitable.

Leftists will stop and nothing to destroy grassroots resistance to the ObamaCare monstrosity. Still, even this latest smear is lower than the lowest of the leftist-regressive low.

At Twitchy, "Despicable: WH smears cancer survivor who lost her insurance plan due to Obamacare." Plus, "Dana Perino slams WH with advice to shameful cancer victim-blaming Dan Pfeiffer."

Yep, this goes right to the top. See James Taranto, at WSJ, "How Low Can They Go? The White House Attacks a Cancer Patient":
Shame on You photo BYPlxHSCEAAwArUjpg-large_zps383916a5.jpeg
It's been just over a month since ObamaCare's disastrous launch, and it's just over three years until the scheduled election of Barack Obama's successor. It's going to be a long three years. The exposure of Obama's signature "achievement" as both incompetent and fraudulent (with its economic inviability yet to be realized) is also showing the administration's true face. It is an ugly one, and we can expect to see a lot more of it while Obama remains in office.

This morning the White House went on the attack against a cancer patient who is also a victim of ObamaCare. Edie Littlefield Sundby of San Diego explains in today's Wall Street Journal that she's been managing a case of stage 4 gallbladder cancer, an affliction whose five-year survival rate is just 2%. Having survived the diagnosis by seven years so far, she beat very long odds--and she did so with the help of an excellent insurance plan that covered care at three hospitals, two in California and one in Texas.

In touting ObamaCare, Obama asserted at least two dozen times (in slightly varying language) that if you like your health plan, you can keep it. As Sundby explains, she is a victim of Obama's fraudulent sales pitch:
Since March 2007 United Healthcare has paid $1.2 million to help keep me alive, and it has never once questioned any treatment or procedure recommended by my medical team. The company pays a fair price to the doctors and hospitals, on time, and is responsive to the emergency treatment requirements of late-stage cancer. Its caring people in the claims office have been readily available to talk to me and my providers.

But in January, United Healthcare sent me a letter announcing that they were pulling out of the individual California market. The company suggested I look to Covered California starting in October.
Covered California is the state ObamaCare exchange, one of those that, unlike the administration-built federal one, has some degree of technical functionality. Thus Sundby was able to log in and check out her options, which--contrary to Obama's "new and improved" sales pitch, that people whose policies are canceled will get better insurance--were unsatisfactory. No plan available to her would cover both her primary-care doctor at the University of California, San Diego, and her oncologist at Stanford. Sundby asks: "What happened to the president's promise, 'You can keep your health plan'? Or to the promise that 'You can keep your doctor'? Thanks to the law, I have been forced to give up a world-class health plan. The exchange would force me to give up a world-class physician." This morning Dan Pfeiffer the fast-talking flack tweeted out a piece from ThinkProgress.org, a leftist propaganda outfit. Titled "The Real Reason That the Cancer Patient Writing in Today's Wall Street Journal Lost Her Insurance," the piece, by one Igor Volsky, claims that "Sundby shouldn't blame reform." Volsky instead blames United Healthcare, which, he writes, "dropped her coverage because they've struggled to compete in California's individual health care market for years and didn't want to pay for sicker patients like Sundby":
"The company's plans reflect its concern that the first wave of newly insured customers under the law may be the costliest," UHC Chief Executive Officer Stephen Helmsley told investors last October. "UnitedHealth will watch and see how the exchanges evolve and expects the first enrollees will have 'a pent-up appetite' for medical care. We are approaching them with some degree of caution because of that."

Get that? The company packed its bags and dumped its beneficiaries because it wants its competitors to swallow the first wave of sicker enrollees only to re-enter the market later and profit from the healthy people who still haven't signed up for coverage.

Sundby is losing her coverage and her doctors because of a business decision her insurer made within the competitive dynamics of California's health care market.
All this may be true, but it begs the question. The addition of a phrase to that last sentence shows why: Sundby is losing her coverage and her doctors because of a business decision her insurer made within the competitive dynamics of California's health care market under the regulatory structure established by Obama's comprehensive "reform." Obama did not qualify his pitch by stating that if you like your health plan, you can keep it unless your insurer makes a business decision to the contrary within the competitive dynamics of your state's health care market. To the contrary, he represented ObamaCare as protecting consumers from precisely that sort of cruel business decision, and he has not backed away from that fraudulent promise: At a speech last Wednesday, he asserted that the only policies being canceled were "substandard" ones offered by former "bad-apple insurers" whose practices ObamaCare reformed.
There's more at the link.

The lame Volsky piece is pure propaganda. Despicable propaganda at that.

Noel Sheppard offers another takedown at NewsBusters, "Obama Advisor Tweets Far-Left Website's Rebuttal to Cancer Survivor Losing Doctors Due to ObamaCare":
... that a senior White House advisor would disseminate such detritus to rebut the claim of a cancer survivor is deplorable.

Sadly, there is no floor to the depths this administration will sink to defend itself or advance its agenda.
Staggering Democrat douchebaggery.


Lucy Pinder Epic Hotness for #Rule5 Monday

Hey, too good to wait for the weekend!

At Egotastic!, "Lucy Pinder in 'Time for Bed' Photoshoot."

#LAX Shooting: It's Jared Loughner and Zeitgeist All Over Again

As is to be expected, when news broke of the shooting at Los Angeles International Airport, the usual suspects were out in force attempting to smear conservatives and gun rights supporters as complicit in the mayhem.



What I noticed was the Southern Poverty Law Center pushing hard on the anti-government, right-wing militia meme.



Despicable people. Especially so since there's little evidence that the suspect, Paul Ciancia, had any coherent ideological program. See Robert Stacy McCain on that, "LAX Shooter: Some Kind of Kook":
There’s this weird little game going on between the Justice Department and the media where bits and pieces of LAX gunman Paul Ciancia’s one-page manifesto keep getting leaked out, and yet it seems no one has the entire note. So the shooter supposedly ranted about the “New World Order” and “fiat currency,” which is being interpreted by some as evidence of a right-wing motive — except, no it’s not: It’s Jared Loughner and Zeitgeist all over again.

Perhaps you’ve forgotten how Loughner, the 2011 Tucson shooter, was a big fan of the pseudo-”documentary” Zeitgeist, which wraps up 9/11 Truther stuff in a lot of conspiracy theory crap about bankers, “fiat currency,” and other such paranoid kook stuff.
Clear enough. And RTWT.

Still, the leftist press is all over the Mark Potok "hate-watch" theory of the right-wing "patriot" anti-goverment types. At yesterday's Los Angeles Times, for example, "LAX shooting comes amid mounting aversion to the TSA":
WASHINGTON — The killing of a TSA screener in Los Angeles is symptomatic of a growing antipathy toward government workers and TSA personnel in particular, experts said Saturday.

Specialists on hate crimes and union officials decried what they said was a general atmosphere of mockery and derision toward TSA agents that they said is amplified by late-night talk show hosts, politicians and news media.

"When people or institutions are vilified on national television and in the public square, you often see people latch on to them as enemies to be destroyed," Mark Potok, a senior fellow at the Southern Poverty Law Center, said in an interview.

Potok has tracked radical groups for more than two decades. He said alleged shooter Paul Anthony Ciancia appeared to have subscribed to anti-government theories about a conspiracy to take away American freedoms and create a single global government.

The violent outburst Friday has put airport screeners around the country on edge, just weeks before terminals will see a rush of passengers during the stressful holiday season.

As Ciancia allegedly blasted his way through the checkpoint, the 23-year-old was looking for transportation security officers to shoot, officials said, and cursing the Transportation Security Administration.

A note found with Ciancia contained a rant against the government and the words "kill TSA," said a federal law enforcement official briefed on the investigation. "I would love to see people stop making villains out of government workers — they are good people" said J. David Cox, the president of the American Federation of Government Employees, the union that represents 45,000 TSA employees. TSA officers are verbally abused by passengers every day, Cox said.

"They may go through your luggage, they may question your name on your ticket, but all that is for your protection. It is not to harass you," he said.
Despicable smears. "Tea party" pops into people's minds when they see these "anti-government" memes. And Mark Potok is the f-king last person to trust commenting on this. You might say (cough, cough), he has an agenda.

Nearly 290,000 to Be Dropped from Insurance Plans in Washington State

And remember, this is by design.

At the Seattle Times, "Canceled health insurance plans add to angst of change" (via Weasel Zippers):
Bill Fullner has reached his breaking point.

It started with the letter from his health-insurance company informing him it was canceling his plan and offering him a new one that’s nearly twice as expensive. Then the 60-year-old retiree from Mount Vernon heard about more people like himself with canceled plans and soaring premiums. Finally, he spent hours on the phone and computer trying — and failing — to find a new option that he likes.

“This whole experience has converted a lifelong Democrat into a foot soldier for the Republican Party,” Fullner said.

He’s not alone in his frustration.

In Washington, most of the 290,000 people covered by insurance plans they purchased on the individual market received letters this fall telling them that their plans are going away.

That’s because under the Affordable Care Act, insurance plans must meet new requirements, including limits on how much money patients spend in out-of-pocket medical expenses, and they must cover 10 so-called essential benefits such as preventive care, prescription drugs and maternity care.

So all 90,181 people with insurance coverage from Regence BlueShield have learned their plans will be canceled, as did all 60,000 people covered by Group Health Cooperative. Some 77,000 people with LifeWise Health Plan, a subsidiary of Premera Blue Cross, also learned their plans were being scrapped.

An additional 24,000 people with LifeWise are covered under “grandfathered” plans that predate the act and will not be canceled, though members will be getting letters in November informing them they can move to another plan if they would like to.
Some folks will qualify for subsidies or they'll be sent to Medicaid, a failing Great Society-era program.

But you just gotta love how this dude Fulner now calls himself "a foot soldier for the Republican Party."

That reminds me of my earlier post, "Dem Party is F****d'." They may well be. They just very well may be.

Sunday, November 3, 2013

Sunday Cartoons

At Flopping Aces, "Sunday Funnies."

William Warren photo You_Have_to_Keep_It-Warren_zpsfedac453.jpg


Also at Randy's Roundtable, "Friday Nite Funnies," and Reaganite Republican, "Reaganite's SUNDAY FUNNIES."

More at Legal Insurrection, "Branco Cartoon – Healthscare.gov."

CARTOON CREDIT: William Warren.

'Dem Party is F****d'

From Ron Fournier, at National Journal, "Obama Takes Friendly Fire" (via Clarice Feldman, "The Silence of the Left").

'Pretty Woman'

I love this song, but this video is a trip. Halfway through it zooms on some woman apparently in the audience and she makes not a move. Indeed, her eyes are cold as ice, almost as if death rays are about to spout forth, lol.

It's all good, in any case. No one could sing Pretty Woman like Roy Orbison.


Lovely Sunday #Rule5

Well, it's been a couple of weeks since my last roundup.

So let's get rockin'!

At the Other McCain, "Rule 5 Sunday: Maximum Acceleration."

And from Soylent Refuge, "Morning Coffee Creamer," and "Marianne."

Theo's Totty photo BTO21_zps30699d18.jpg

More at Pirate's Cove, "Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup," and "If All You See……is an evil rising ocean that can only be stopped by the paternal hand of Government, you might just be a Warmist."

And from Bob Belvedere, "Rule 5 Saturday: Sophie Mei."

Also Daley Gator, "DaleyGator DaleyBabes Saturday Beauty."

More at Knuckledraggin', "Your Good Morning Girl," and "And who doesn’t miss the micro mini skirt?"

And In a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World has the "Friday Pinups."

At EBL, "Shocking Study: People tend to focus on a woman's breasts..."

Now from Wine, Women, and Politics as well, "Weekend Sweeties."

At Animal Magnetism, "Solo Ginger Saturday."

From Blackmailers Don't Shoot, "Pretty Girls on a Thursday, Halloween Hotties Edition."

Proof Positive, "Bye Week for San Francisco 49er's," and "The Best of the Web* Linkaround."

See also, the Hostages, "Big Boob Friday."

Plus, from Drunken Stepfather, "Steplinks of the Day."

And at a View From the Beach, "Rule 5 Saturday - Covert Coyote - Piper Perabo."

Good Stuff's has "Amanda Kerr."

First Street Journal has, "Rule 5 Blogging: Wooden Shoes Edition."

At Odie's, "Coffee ? ~OR~ Rule 5 Woodsterman Style."

And at Randy’s Roundtable, "Thursday Nite Tart - Kathy Eusse."

Postal Dogs, "Bree Olson."

And at Egotastic!, "Happy 18th Birthday Kendall Jenner (You Have Arrived)," and "Adriana Lima’s Sexy Lingerie and Other Fine Things to Ogle."

Still more at Subject to Change, "Humpday."

Plus, at 90 Miles From Tyranny, "Girls With Guns," and "Morning Mistress."

Drop your links in the comments of I've missed your Rule 5.

Until then...

Maybe Ted Cruz Won That Shutdown Fight After All

He totally won the shutdown fight.

And House Republicans did themselves right by standing firm as long as they could. Remember, Republicans fully funded the budget except for ObamaCare. The White House knew the system was screwed all along. It should have taken the deal and punted healthcare past the 2014 elections. Now everything's FUBAR with no rescue in sight.

Lonely Con has it, with a pithy response on Twitter:



Whoa — Associated Press Gets Real on #ObamaCare!

Man, how times change!

What's amazing to me with the ObamaCare debacle is how the normally boot-licking Democrat press has been consistently tearing into the administration. Associated Press was savaged during the Bush years as a hopeless shill for the anti-American left. But these days you'd think AP was an in-house organ at Fox News.

See, "Health policy cancellations are new blow for administration" (via Laura Ingraham).



And at the AP homepage, "STICKER SHOCK OFTEN FOLLOWS INSURANCE CANCELLATION" (via Lonely Con), and "OBAMA'S HEALTH LAW FINALLY GETS REAL FOR AMERICA":
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Now is when Americans start figuring out that President Barack Obama's health care law goes beyond political talk, and really does affect them and people they know.

With a cranky federal website complicating access to new coverage and some consumers being notified their existing plans are going away, the potential for winners and losers is creating anxiety and confusion....

The Obama administration insists nobody will lose coverage as a result of cancellation notices going out to millions of people. At least 3.5 million Americans have been issued cancellations, but the exact number is unclear. Associated Press checks find that data is unavailable in a half the states.

Mainly they are people who buy directly from an insurer, instead of having workplace coverage. Officials say these consumers aren't getting "canceled" but "transitioned" or "migrated" to better plans because their current coverage doesn't meet minimum standards. They won't have to go uninsured, and some could save a lot if they qualify for the law's tax credits.

Speaking in Boston's historic Faneuil Hall this past week, Obama said the problem is limited to fewer than 5 percent of Americans "who've got cut-rate plans that don't offer real financial protection in the event of a serious illness or an accident."

But in a nation of more than 300 million, 5 percent is a big number - about 15 million people. Among them are Ian and Sara Hodge of Lancaster, Pa., in their early 60s and paying $1,041 a month for a policy.

After insurer Highmark, Inc., sent the Hodges a cancellation notice, the cheapest rate they say they've been able to find is $1,400 for a comparable plan. Ian is worried they may not qualify for tax credits, and doesn't trust that the federal website is secure enough to enter personal financial information in order to find out.

"We feel like we're being punished for doing the right thing," he said.

Their policy may not have met the government's standards, "but it certainly met our minimum standards," Hodge added.

"The main thing that upsets us is the president ... said over and over and over again: If you like your health plan, you will be able to keep your health plan, guaranteed."

There's a chance the number of people getting unwanted terminations may grow. In 2015, the law's requirement that larger companies provide health insurance will take effect. It's expected that a small share of firms will drop coverage, deciding that it's cheaper to pay fines imposed under the law.
The piece notes that some people have seen improved coverage under the law, but attitudes are overall negative and more change --- adverse change --- is coming down the pipeline, especially once the employer mandate kicks in after 2015:
Up to now, the changes for employer plans have been incremental. They tend to expand benefits, not take things away.

For example, young adults can stay on a parent's coverage until they turn 26. Employers cover women's birth control as a preventive service, free of charge. Screening tests such as colonoscopies are also free.

But cost control provisions, mainly a tax on expensive insurance plans that starts in 2018, are converging with the long-standing push by employers to tame health costs. Some companies have raised deductibles and copayments for employees, saying they need to scale back to avoid tangling with the coming tax. Others are giving employees a fixed amount of money to shop in private health insurance markets that resemble those created by the law.

Expect cutbacks to be blamed on the law. Sorting out whether that's warranted may be difficult.

"What the Affordable Care Act did was give companies a very convenient excuse to say `Oh, gosh, we really have to get serious about insurance costs,'" said Paul Keckley, an independent health benefits consultant. "I think there's a bit of a bob and weave. The ACA was a convenient excuse for doing what (corporate) human resources departments have been calculating to do for years."

New York Times Propaganda: Obama 'Misspoke' About Keeping Your Plan

This is really a bit much.

The editors at the New York Times richly deserve the mockery now pummeling them.

Here's the editorial, "Insurance Policies Not Worth Keeping":
Congressional Republicans have stoked consumer fears and confusion with charges that the health care reform law is causing insurers to cancel existing policies and will force many people to pay substantially higher premiums next year for coverage they don’t want. That, they say, violates President Obama’s pledge that if you like the insurance you have, you can keep it.

Mr. Obama clearly misspoke when he said that. By law, insurers cannot continue to sell policies that don’t provide the minimum benefits and consumer protections required as of next year. So they’ve sent cancellation notices to hundreds of thousands of people who hold these substandard policies.
Once again, the editors, as cutout ideological leftists, just don't get it: People liked their plans, or they wouldn't have purchased them. They like the affordability and flexibility, and especially the power to choose their doctors and hospitals. Listen to Natalie Willis, who was featured in the blockbuster CBS report a couple of weeks back, now making appearances on Fox News:



Ms. Willis says "I did a lot of research before I picked the plan that I had in the first place, and if I had wanted more coverage I would have just gotten another plan. So I really like the plan ... you know, I don't want more. That's why I didn't have more in the first place."

In other words, she bought the insurance policy that was right for her.

But now under ObamaCare she can't have what she researched, purchased, and liked. She's got to have much more coverage, and so far she's been unable to purchase a new plan because the healthcare website she's using in California is kinky, confusing, and difficuly to use.

Democrats can't spin this epic consumer dissatisfaction away. It's despicable for the New York Times to blame Republicans for stoking "consumer fears." Republicans didn't go searching for disgruntled Americans. The mainstream media outlets have been bursting at the seams with story after story of unhappy customers. Nearly a month ago, the San Jose Mercury News published the devastating piece detailing the "winners and losers" in California's shift to ObamaCare. It's been an avalanche of bad news for the left since then. Just last week, the the Los Angeles Times came out with the devastating piece outlining massive frustration with skyrocketing premiums in the state.

So the left, once again, is back to lying. And by now it's gotten so transparent it'd be funny if the stakes weren't so high.

Here's more at Twitchy, "Boot-licking fail: You won’t believe NYT’s excuse for Obama’s ‘you can keep your plan’ lie."


More at Viking Pundit, "The New York Times beclowns itself again." And Patterico, "The New York Times is beyond parody" (via Memeorandum).

Added: The Other McCain has more, "Obama and the New York Times Decide Which Health Plans Are Worth Keeping."

Pissed-Off 'ObamaCare Losers' Could Pack Political Punch

Oh boy, people are gonna be fired up next November.

At Politico, "Obamacare losers could pack political punch":
Meet the new Soccer Mom: Obamacare losers.

Millions of married, older, white, college-educated, GOP-leaning Americans have quickly seen their political profile rise after their health insurance companies sent them cancellation letters with the launch of the giant new health care law.

It’s not a huge segment of the population — estimates show between 10 million to 19 million people bought health insurance from what Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius dubbed the “Wild West” individual marketplace.

But the ones who are making the most anti-Obamacare noise are part of this group (think of the self-employed, small business owners, freelance writers, musicians and taxi cab drivers) that share one politically pertinent common denominator. Their complaints — amplified in recent weeks by Republicans and reporters — demonstrate one of the first tangible stumbles of the Affordable Care Act.

“It’s not theoretical anymore,” said Virginia-based health industry consultant Robert Laszewski. “You can spin in the White House press room, but these are people who will be sitting down with their friends and families at Thanksgiving sharing stories about their cancellation letters. That’s going to be the only thing that counts.”

Horror stories already abound of people who can’t get insurance through their employer and are now finding that their old plans don’t measure up to Obamacare’s standards. There may indeed be better policies around the corner, giving people more protections when they actually do get sick and requiring guaranteed coverage for things like prescription drugs, emergency hospital visits, maternity and mental health and not being black listed due to a preexisting condition.

Still, it’s the shock of the change — especially after President Barack Obama repeatedly promised that anyone could keep the plan that they had — that is very real and threatens to resonate through the 2014 midterm campaign...
More at the link. (Via Memeorandum.)

RELATED: "Obama Lied — White House Aides Debated President's Pledge to Americans: 'You Can Keep Your Plan'."

Saturday, November 2, 2013

GOP Gives Health Law Stumbling Room

Republicans need to let this play out for awhile.

The law's not working and Democrat lies are finally getting the sunshine they so richly deserve.

At the Wall Street Journal, "Republicans Give Health Law Room to Stumble: New Tack Is a Departure From More Confrontational Approach Still Favored by Some in Party":
WASHINGTON—Many House Republicans are replacing their push to delay or defund the 2010 federal health law with a new strategy: Hang back and see if problems with the rollout continue or get worse.

It is an abrupt reversal of the activist approach of just weeks ago, when Republicans demanded changes to the law in exchange for funding the government or raising the nation's borrowing limit. Now, they say putting the spotlight on technical flaws of the law's health-insurance exchange may be more effective than a direct attack.

"It's its own worst enemy, and to some degree it is collapsing under its own weight," said Rep. Michael Burgess (R., Texas), who sits on the committee that pressed Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on Wednesday to explain what is going wrong.
Give 'em enough rope.

More at the link.



KMET Mighty Met Mighty Weekend on The Sound 100.3 FM

If you're an L.A. native, and a baby-boomer, then this weekend's rollback to the 1970s KMET radio at The Sound L.A. is right up your alley.

I'm listening right now.



The Ballad of John and Yoko - The Beatles 2:36 PM

Lunatic Fringe - Red Rider 2:31 PM

Peace of Mind - Boston 2:26 PM

Take Me To The Pilot - Elton John 2:22 PM

King of Pain - The Police 2:10 PM

Spirit In the Night - Bruce Springsteen 2:05 PM

Lovin', Touchin' Squeezin' - Journey 2:00 PM

Who Are You - WHO 1:54 PM

Dancin' Fool - Frank Zappa 1:50 PM

In the Mood - Robert Plant 1:36 PM

DON'T FEAR THE REAPER - B.O.C. 1:31 PM

Bungle In the Jungle - Jethro Tull 1:27 PM

Unchained -  Van Halen 1:23 PM

Midnight Rambler - The Rolling Stones 1:08 PM

Rhiannon - Fleetwood Mac 1:04 PM

Back In Black - AC/DC 1 PM

Jim Ladd's on tonight at 5:00pm. I used to love that guy!

Obama Lied — White House Aides Debated President's Pledge to Americans: 'You Can Keep Your Plan'

The president lied to the American people. It wasn't a "talking point." It wasn't a "political lie" to get something passed. It wasn't "posturing." Obama made bald-faced lies, multiple times, telling citizens they could keep their healthcare plans if they liked them. And that they could keep their doctors. He lied. Again and again. "Period." You can keep your plan. "Period."

What part of "period" don't leftists understand? Leftists like this far-left Obama-shill Bill Scher at Bloggingheads, via Althouse, "'Bill Scher does not accept that it was a lie to say "if you like your healthcare plan, you can keep it'."

The president's a disgusting pig and socialist scumbag liar. The Wall Street Journal documents it, mercilessly, "Aides Debated Obama Health-Care Coverage Promise: Behind the Scenes, White House Officials Worried About Insurance Pledge":

 photo BYAQEZECIAAwF7Ojpg-large_zpse0d068a0.jpeg

As President Barack Obama pushed for a new federal health law in 2009, he made a simple pledge: If you like your insurance plan, you can keep your plan. But behind the scenes, White House officials discussed whether that was a promise they could keep.

When the question arose, Mr. Obama’s advisers decided that the assertion was fair, interviews with more than a dozen people involved in crafting and explaining the president’s health-care plan show.

But at times, there was second-guessing. At one point, aides discussed whether Mr. Obama might use more in-depth discussions, such as media interviews, to explain the nuances of the succinct line in his stump speeches, a former aide said. Officials worried, though, that delving into details such as the small number of people who might lose insurance could be confusing and would clutter the president’s message.

“You try to talk about health care in broad, intelligible points that cut through, and you inevitably lose some accuracy when you do that,” the former official said.

The former official added that in the midst of a hard-fought political debate “if you like your plan, you can probably keep it” isn’t a salable point.

The breadth of Mr. Obama’s statement proved to be a miscalculation. Mr. Obama repeated the claim, with only occasional caveats, through this week, when a flurry of cancellation notices from insurers to customers around the country prompted him to recalibrate. The resulting furor has energized Republican opposition to the plan, which only a few weeks ago had fallen flat as a result of the party’s failed attempt to link it to government spending and debt deadlines.

“With 20/20 hindsight, maybe this should have been parsed more carefully,” said Jim Margolis, a media adviser to Mr. Obama’s campaigns in 2008 and 2012, said of Mr. Obama’s broad promise. But, he added, “The president’s statement seems fair.”

At the time the law was being written, Mr. Obama was trying to make the case for the health-care overhaul in understandable terms, and in an environment in which Republicans were casting it as a “big government” takeover of the health system. Mr. Obama’s aides were focused on telling people that disruption would be minimal and benefits from the law substantial.

Aides said that because insurers could continue offering plans, even those deemed to be substandard, if they were in existence at the time the law passed, Mr. Obama’s statement that “you can keep your plan” was solid.

“We thought we could fulfill the promise with this grandfathering clause,” said Ezekiel Emanuel, vice provost at the University of Pennsylvania and a former White House health-care adviser.

The health law aims to eliminate certain low-premium policies that the administration said provide skimpy coverage and could leave people with high out-of-pocket costs. While it allows insurers to continue covering longtime customers with policies that were in existence as of March 2010, many insurers are canceling such plans because they would die out, anyway, in the absence of new customers.

About 5% of the U.S. population, or about 15.4 million people, are covered under individual health plans, and many of them—as many as 10 million—are expected to have their health plans terminated by their insurers by year-end, industry experts have said. These customers account for many of those now receiving cancellation notices; Mr. Obama says they will be able to buy better coverage on the new federal insurance exchange.

One former senior administration official said that as the law was being crafted by the White House and lawmakers, some White House policy advisers objected to the breadth of Mr. Obama’s “keep your plan” promise. They were overruled by political aides, the former official said. The White House said it was unaware of the objections.

Mr. Obama began offering broad assurances as he campaigned for president in 2008, before the Affordable Care Act was written or many of the details decided. In a presidential debate with Republican nominee John McCain, Mr. Obama said that “if you’ve got health care already…you can keep your plan.”

Before then, Hillary Clinton was making similar promises about her proposed health-care overhaul. As she campaigned for president in 2007, Mrs. Clinton said, “Here’s how my plan works: If you already have private insurance, and you’re happy with it, nothing changes. You keep that insurance.”

Mr. Obama adopted similar language during the campaign and continued to use it in the White House as he pitched Congress and the American people on his health-care legislation.

Jon Favreau, who served as Mr. Obama’s top speech writer, said that as they tried to promote the overhaul plan and explain it to the public, the aim was to make it as simple as possible “while still being true.”

“Simplification and ease of explanation were a premium, and that was true throughout the process,” he said.

Richard Kirsch, the former national campaign manager of Health Care for America Now, which pushed for the 2010 health law, said the words were reassuring—and true—for the vast majority of the people, and so his group never raised concerns about that claim. Adding an asterisk to note that people who had “shoddy insurance” might need to change plans was not practical, he said.

“The actual, accurate statement is if you have good insurance, and you like it, you can keep it,” said Mr. Kirsch, now a senior fellow at the Roosevelt Institute, a liberal policy organization.

The fact that insurers are cancelling policies covering some people has become central to the Republican argument against the Affordable Care Act, adding to the administration’s problems as it struggles to fix a malfunctioning website.

Reince Priebus, chairman of the Republican National Committee, seized upon Mr. Obama’s words, writing in an email Friday to supporters, “Here’s the truth: Barack Obama knowingly and repeatedly lied to Americans.”
Like the idiot Bill Scher at Bloggingheads, leftists just keep piling on lie after lie to further deceive the public about their dishonest healthcare program. Here's top Obama-Democrat Robert Axelrod at the article:
David Axelrod, a senior White House adviser during the health-care fight, said there was no intention to mislead.

“The great misfortune here is that the website debacle occurred at the same time as this issue arising,” he said. “Because, if the website hadn’t gone down, then lots of these people would be going online and figuring out, ‘Hey I’m getting a better insurance policy, and I’ll have to pay less money for it.’ But they can’t, because the website is down.

“It’s a perfect storm that has created an opportunity for those who oppose the plan.”
That's bullshit. People are not finding cheaper policies on the website. They're finding inferior cookie-cutter policies with higher premiums and higher deductibles. This fact is why the new Democrat meme is that Americans were being sold "shoddy plans" on the individual market. But the policies weren't "shoddy." These were healthcare policies that millions of Americans researched, compared, evaluated and then purchased --- because they liked them.

These are plans like the one purchased by Kathleen Crowley, a woman booted from her health policy due to ObamaCare, covered in James Taranto's column yesterday, "President Obama's #ObamaCare Lie":
My health-care policy was cancelled, and the Obama administration's explanation that policies are being cancelled because they were "substandard" and issued by "bad apple" insurers is absolutely not true. I had a very comprehensive policy, with a large and solid national health insurer, and the reasons my policy was not "ACA compliant" is because I now have to pay for maternity coverage, general pediatric coverage and pediatric dental coverage, as prescribed by ObamaCare. I'm 55 years old, have no children and don't plan to have children. Clearly, I am beyond childbearing age, and without children. Why would I have to purchase pediatric dental insurance? Or general pediatric care?

ObamaCare is forcing people to purchase a product that they don't want and can't ever use. I do not need maternity or pediatric services but have to purchase them. The new policy that would have been "comparable" to my current policy is more expensive with higher deductibles.

The president's comment of "shop around" is so smug. I sat on hold with an insurer while "shopping around" yesterday for over 20 minutes and finally gave up because I had work to do. I'll now have to factor quite a bit of time into my day to "shop around" since this president's dictates have resulted in my loss of health insurance I liked very much, and the market is now flooded with other people "shopping around."
What the insurance debacle reveals is the ultimate failure of progressivism. Leftists pride themselves on superior knowledge and noble intentions. But when that knowledge and those intentions are tested in the real consumer marketplace they come up wanting, badly. It's one big fail after another, and don't forget that the country was warned about this from day one: "It won't work." We were warned, over and over, from congressional Republicans, from free-market think tanks, down to the thousands of tea party patriots protesting throughout 2009.

And things are not going to get better. The administration's not keeping its promises to have the website fully functioning by November 1st. Just this week Secretary Sebelius further soiled herself as a national laughingstock with her claims during congressional testimony that Healthcare.gov "didn't crash." Yet at the very second she uttered those words, House Republicans couldn't logon to the system and the error message was played on the overhead during the hearings, "the system is down at the moment."

Sebelius Testimony photo Sebelius-website-screen-620x461_zpsf54d90b1.jpg

It's all lies.

From Obama to Axelrod to Sebelius to this idiot Bloggingheads ghoul Bill Scher. It's all lies.

The country has been sold a bill of healthcare goods. And our healthcare system is being systematically dismantled and destroyed. This is no accident. It's like the generals in Vietnam who claimed that "we had to destroy the village in order to save it." Democrats had to destroy American healthcare in order to fundamentally transform it. And they knew that they were f-king the average Joe up the ass. So they lied. The president lied. Congressional Democrats lied. Stephanie Cutter lied. Leftist media shills lied. We've been lied to.

It's time to stop with the lies.

Tell Congress and the president to stop lying. Tell them that they're going pay for their lies. They will pay for it with their political hide, and if criminal negligence is found, they'll pay in a court of law and hopefully with time in a penitentiary. These are monumental lies that bring disgrace to representative government. There's going to be a reckoning. The 2014 elections are one year from now. Each national election is billed as the most important in American history. The 2012 presidential election filled the bill, and conservatives lost. They can't make that mistake again if they hope to salvage whatever decency and free will is left in this country. People need to rise up and say this is f-king enough.

President Obama's #ObamaCare Lie

The president's a f-king liar.

Everyone knows it --- or at least now they do, after the health care debacle is no longer a theoretical possibility, but an abomination now really, truly destroying the American marketplace.

James Taranto has the latest on this cluster-k, "When Fraud Is Legal" (at Memeorandum):
Under socialism, there's no such thing as consumer protection.
Obama Liar photo WilshireFederalBuilding027-1_zpsb95548bf.jpg
d

Halloween Skate Jam

The 2013 Burnside skatepark Halloween jam in Portland, Oregon.



Can #ObamaCare Fiasco Save the GOP?

From Jonathan Tobin, at Commentary:
With each passing day since the president’s signature health care legislation was launched it’s now obvious that the administration has lost control of the story. At first it was just a matter of a dysfunctional website. Then it became one in which the incompetence of the Department of Heath and Human Services was compounded by the arrogance of Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and the denials of the White House. But once it became apparent that President Obama had been lying for the last three years when he repeatedly promised that Americans would be able to keep their insurance if they liked it rather than being forced onto the ObamaCare exchanges, a tipping point was reached. That more details are leaking out every day that reinforces the negative impression of ObamaCare is adding to the administration’s problems.

So it’s little surprise that the New York Times led its front page with a story about how Democrats are “feeling anxious” about the future tied to the ObamaCare boondoggle. While some in the party are claiming, as Senator Chuck Schumer did, that the anger at the Tea Party over the shutdown will be more of a “long-term” liability for the GOP, most Democrats know better. The ObamaCare disaster not only changed the political narrative that worked so well for them. It goes straight to the heart of an underlying liberal weakness: the belief that big government is not only incompetent but also a threat to the wellbeing and the pocketbooks of ordinary Americans.
Well, the rollout debacle's not going to "save" the GOP. It's debatable whether Republicans needing saving. ObamaCare's just the tip of the iceberg of Democrat policy failures. It's just this time Democrats and the Democrat-enabling media can't fool the public with their Orwellian totalitarianism. Republicans need to play their cards right. I expect they'll hold the house next November, but they can't get cocky and they need to offer a popular alternative to the law. Still, it's been a staggering turnaround of fortunes this last few weeks, and it's got the leftists tied up in knots as reality bites down hard.

More at that top link.

'Websites for Dummies'

Boy, that would've been delectable.

At the Blaze, "Tennessee State Senator Presents Kathleen Sebelius With Really Embarrassing 'Gift' – and She Doesn't Look Very Happy About It..."

And at Twitchy, "Ouch! Tenn. state senator presents Kathleen Sebelius with book that might come in handy [pic]."

Sebelius photo BYBJE9rIcAAdxEkjpg-large_zpsdc1c4b4d.jpeg

Senate Democrats Supported #ObamaCare Regs That Destroyed Individual Insurance Market

Oh boy.

And this was on CNN no less.

At Legal Insurrection, "Senate Dems killed (Obamacare) grandfather (fix)":
They own all of our Obamacare problems, completely.

CNN reports, Senate Democrats supported rule that led to insurance cancellations:
Senate Democrats voted unanimously three years ago to support the Obamacare rule that is largely responsible for some of the health insurance cancellation letters that are going out.

In September 2010, Senate Republicans brought a resolution to the floor to block implementation of the grandfather rule, warning that it would result in canceled policies and violate President Barack Obama’s promise that people could keep their insurance if they liked it.

“The District of Columbia is an island surrounded by reality. Only in the District of Columbia could you get away with telling the people if you like what you have you can keep it, and then pass regulations six months later that do just the opposite and figure that people are going to ignore it. But common sense is eventually going to prevail in this town and common sense is going to have to prevail on this piece of legislation as well,” Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley said at the time.

“The administration’s own regulations prove this is not the case. Under the grandfathering regulation, according to the White House’s own economic impact analysis, as many as 69 percent of businesses will lose their grandfathered status by 2013 and be forced to buy government-approved plans,” the Iowa Republican said.

On a party line vote, Democrats killed the resolution, which could come back to haunt vulnerable Democrats up for re-election this year.

Bwahaha!! Hilarious New Yorker Covers Slams #ObamaCare Rollout Debacle

Love the Motorola DynaTAC cell phone (Zack Morris).

At Twitchy, "‘Obama sporting Zack Morris’ cellphone’: New Yorker ‘reboot’ cover nails O-care launch [pic]." And a NewsBusters, "New Yorker Mag Cover Slams Obama and Sebelius."

Also, from Reliapundit, "IF YOU'VE LOST THE NEW YORKER MAGAZINE, THEN..."

 photo 58da87a7-3136-44c8-8cd2-a91e5042360c_zps9e04b730.jpg

Friday, November 1, 2013

Deadly Rampage Creates Chaos at #LAX

At LAT, "Chaos follows LAX shooting."



More at NYT, "Security Agent Is Killed at Los Angeles Airport."

Over 93 Millions Americans Could Lose Employer-Based Health Coverage as #ObamaCare Non-Compliant

At National Review, "Roy: Experts Knew Obama’s Promise ‘Was a Lie’":


Avik Roy sat down with Megyn Kelly to share his latest piece over at Forbes that found that more than half of employer-based health-care plans will be deemed illegal next year because they will no longer be Obamacare compliant. This signals the latest blow to President Obama’s controversial promise that people could keep their health-care plans, which Roy said experts knew wasn’t true to begin with.

“Everyone in the health-policy community left, right, or center knew this was a lie,” he said on Fox News on Thursday night. Unfortunately, at the time, critics of the law could only offer theoretical arguments, not real-world examples.

“The difference now is that people are getting cancellation notices — journalists can go and interview the people getting the cancellation notices,” he said.

Make the F-kers Eat It: Supreme Court Called #ObamaCare Mandate a Tax; GOP Should Make Democrats Own It

From Randy Barnett and Josh Blackman, at USA Today, "Dems may have to admit Obamacare tax increase" (via Instapundit):
Remember, in 2009, the president emphatically denied to George Stephanopoulos that the Affordable Care Act imposed a tax increase. Yet, after the Supreme Court decision, going into the 2012 election, the White House again seemed to deny that the mandate was a tax, notwithstanding the administration’s argument to the Court.

Now, as the price for delaying the implementation of the court-created tax penalty, Republicans should demand truth in labeling. The Democrats in Congress must now admit they have imposed a tax on young and healthy Americans to get them to take the bad deal that is Obamacare. And any suspension of this tax must be scored by the Congressional Budget Office so the public knows the size of the tax increase that will be imposed on the American people when the delay ends and the tax kicks in. No longer will congressional supporters of the ACA be able to evade political responsibility.

On the other hand, if the Democrats insist that the penalty is not a tax, then they will be admitting that it is unconstitutional under the Supreme Court’s decision. If Congress contradicts what the administration told the Supreme Court, a new challenge can be brought under the precedent of NFIB v. Sebelius. The president, and those who supported this law, should now be forced to bear the political consequences of their legislative and litigation legerdemain. If Obamacare can only legally live by the tax, then its supporters in Congress must politically die by the tax.
RTWT.

Gunman Kills TSA Officer at Los Angeles International Airport #LAX

At the Wall Street Journal, "TSA Worker Killed in LAX Shooting; Suspect in Custody: FAA Curtails Planes Following Incident."

And at the Los Angeles Times, "LAX shooting: Gunman left anti-government note, targeted TSA."



I'll have more on this.

Meanwhile, follow Dana Loesch Dana Loesch for the latest developments on the Piers Morgan gun control angle.

Morgan Stanley Bearish on Holiday Shopping Season

I don't know.

Seems like things are actually picking up lately. Besides, didn't Morgan Stanley get an Obama bail out after the 2008 crash? Moral hazard and all that. Who's can trust 'em?

Well, as Kathleen Sebelius would say, "whatever."

At LAT, "Holiday-season retail sales look bleak, Morgan Stanley predicts":
Count on coal this Christmas.

That's what researchers at Morgan Stanley are saying in the first major forecast of a decidedly dour holiday season. Retailers hoping for a respite from a year of so-so shopping can instead expect the worst Thanksgiving-to-Christmas sales since 2008, the financial services firm said Thursday.

Five years ago, the industry was free-falling into recession. This year, a new collection of worrisome economic conditions looms as stores gear up for a period that can sometimes account for 40% of annual revenue.

Shopper confidence is low. The recent federal government stalemate and shutdown was a damper. The window for holiday shopping is six days shorter than it was last year.

At the same time, consumer spending, which makes up more than two-thirds of economic activity, is actually getting a boost. Gasoline prices are lower, and net worth is rising because of higher real estate values and a stock market upswing, Morgan Stanley said in a report.

But instead of shoveling extra money into gifts, many Americans are plowing it into big-ticket items such as cars, appliances and home improvement goods.

The report anticipates that during the fourth quarter, retailers will see a scant 1.7% increase in sales at stores open at least a year. Such same-store sales are an important indicator because they eliminate the effect of opening and closing outlets during the previous 12 months.

Strip out struggling J.C. Penney Co., which researchers predict will roll out deep discounts early in the season, and projected sales growth slips to 1.6%.

That's less than half of last year's 3.5% expansion, according to Morgan Stanley...
Nah. It's gonna be fine.

Indeed, the piece continues, "the National Retail Federation said it expected holiday sales to rise 3.9% to $602.1 billion." That's what I'm talking about!

Ethnic Studies Programs Crash and Burn at Cal State University

Hey, it was good while it lasted, right?

At LAT, "Cal State's ethnic studies programs falter in changing times":
In the 1960s, California college campuses were hotbeds of civil rights and free speech activity, where student protests resulted in the nation's first ethnic studies programs at San Francisco State and UC Berkeley, among others.

Ethnic studies became a sought-after major and a safe setting in which to examine the influence of the state's diverse population of Latinos, African Americans, whites and Asians, among others.

In recent years, however, some of those programs have been cut back, particularly in the California State University system. Today, students — and faculty — are once again protesting: this time to save ethnic studies majors.

At such campuses as San Jose, Stanislaus, Bakersfield, Long Beach and elsewhere, professors aren't being replaced, classes are being reduced and majors could be eliminated or subsumed into other liberal arts programs. The moves have reignited old debates — and wounds —- about Cal State's commitment to social and cultural diversity.

Educators and others say that as campuses look to trim costs, ethnic studies programs are bearing the brunt and could be seen as irrelevant.

Administrators counter that many programs are not attracting enough students to fill classes.

The programs also face stiff competition as students of all ethnicities focus more on obtaining degrees with immediate job prospects.

"A discipline like ethnic studies lays itself wide open to the critiques of what the hell do you do with this, can you run a corporation or fly a plane with this?," said Ron Scapp, president of the National Assn. for Ethnic Studies, which is conducting a national survey on the status of such programs.

But Scapp and others said that debates over immigration, the election of the country's first black president and the aftermath of the shooting death of black teenager Trayvon Martin by a white man show the nation is still grappling with issues of race and cultural diversity. Ethnic studies programs, he said, offer a forum to tackle these topics.

The initial intent of the programs was to increase the numbers of students and professors of color and expand historical perspectives, including those of Native Americans, women, gays and lesbians.

But it was also divisive, with some critics arguing that the disciplines lacked academic rigor. In 2010, Arizona banned school districts from offering ethnic studies programs determined to be radical or fostering racial resentment.

A recent move to reduce the status of the Africana Studies Department at Cal State Long Beach led the state Assembly to adopt a resolution urging that it and other such programs be maintained. Cal State Chancellor Timothy White put the changes on hold until the campus finds a permanent replacement for former President F. King Alexander...
Oh the humanities!

Hey, speaking of the humanities, it's hard times all around. At the New York Times, "As Interest Fades in the Humanities, Colleges Worry."

Suddenly, Obama Loves Mitt Romney as He Walks Back His Keep-Your-Health-Plan Promise

A smashing editorial at the Wall Street Journal, "A President Manqué":
Voters may recall Mr. Romney as the Republican candidate the Obama campaign said was responsible for the death of a Missouri steelworker's wife, among many other White House inventions. But on Wednesday Mr. Obama cited Mr. Romney as a political model who did "the right thing on health care" and built "this template of proven, bipartisan success."

Mr. Romney responded more rapidly than his Presidential campaign usually did and issued a statement saying that "a plan crafted to fit the unique circumstances of a single state should not be grafted onto the entire country" and disavowing the "frustrating embarrassment" of ObamaCare.

The Boston trip is classic example of the Obama political method and why his Presidency is floundering only a year into his second term. Amid a crisis of government execution and policy design, Mr. Obama doesn't address the flaws or take responsibility.

Instead he hits the campaign trail to blame Republicans once again for a failure they had nothing to do with—and to spin new political fables to replace the old ones that even he can no longer utter with a straight face. On his current behavior, the only time Mr. Obama is going to act as if he's President is when he no longer is.
RTWT.

#ObamaCare’s Ugly Authoritarian Problem

From David Harsanyi, at the Federalist, "Obamacare’s Ugly Authoritarian Problem":
It’s almost as if some people believe lying is acceptable – even preferable — if the political outcomes are morally pleasing to them [progressives]. Many Obamacare supporters, in fact, are beginning to sound like they couldn’t care less about process, the law, order, competence, or anything that undermines the goal of putting your health-care choices into more capable hands.
Yeah.

Almost acceptable. Hilarious, isn't it? Hardy-har-har.

Continue reading.

U.S. Military Wants 'Iron Man' Suit

At LAT, "U.S. military wants to create 'Iron Man suit'."